Web Brain InfoTech is a UX research and design agency based in Delhi, India, running usability testing for websites, mobile apps, SaaS platforms, and prototypes across India and international markets including the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, and UAE. We watch real users attempt real tasks, then show you exactly where they struggle and what to fix first.
Usability testing is a UX research method in which representative users complete realistic tasks on a product or prototype while observers record success, errors, time taken, and comments, to reveal usability problems before or after launch.
Web Brain InfoTech — Usability Testing Agency, Delhi, India. Serving clients worldwide.
Usability testing measures how easily people can use a product to achieve their goals. Participants perform defined tasks, such as signing up, finding a product, or completing checkout, while a researcher observes behavior without leading them.
It focuses on behavior over opinion: what users do matters more than what they say they would do.
Design teams know their product too well to see it as a newcomer does. Testing exposes the gaps. It helps you:
Fix issues in prototypes before development costs rise.
Remove friction from forms, navigation, and checkout.
Clearer interfaces generate fewer questions.
Settle debates with observed evidence.
Products that are easy to use earn trust and repeat use.
| Type | How It Works | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Moderated testing | A researcher guides the session live and asks follow-up questions | Complex flows and deep understanding |
| Unmoderated testing | Participants complete tasks alone, recorded by a platform | Fast, larger-scale results at lower cost |
| Remote testing | Sessions run online across locations | Geographically spread audiences |
| In-person testing | Sessions run face to face in a lab or on site | Physical products and close observation |
| Guerrilla testing | Quick, informal tests with passersby | Early, low-cost feedback on concepts |
| Benchmark testing | Repeated tests with the same metrics over time | Tracking improvement across versions |
| Comparative testing | Two or more designs tested against each other | Choosing between design options |
We recommend the format based on your stage, budget, and questions.
On iOS and Android.
Built in Figma, before any code exists.
With assistive technology.
Participants speak their thoughts while completing tasks.
Realistic goals without hints about where to click.
Checking whether users start in the right place.
Validating navigation and labels.
Comparing variants.
Capturing satisfaction ratings.
Where available and relevant.
The share of users who finish each task.
How long each task takes.
Wrong clicks, dead ends, and recoveries.
A 10-question score from 0 to 100, widely benchmarked against an average of roughly 68.
A quick rating of how easy each task felt.
Effort and satisfaction ratings.
Each issue ranked by how seriously it blocks users.
We rank each finding so your team knows where to start. Ratings combine:
How many participants hit the problem.
Whether it blocks, slows, or only annoys.
Whether users overcome it after the first encounter.
Effect on conversion, retention, or trust.
Issues are grouped as critical, serious, moderate, or minor, each paired with a specific recommendation.
For qualitative usability testing, a round of about 5 participants per user segment typically surfaces most of the major problems. Running several small rounds, with fixes between them, tends to work better than one large test. Quantitative or benchmark studies need larger samples to produce stable numbers.
We set sample size according to your user segments, goals, and risk level.
Yes. Accessibility testing checks whether people with disabilities can use your product. We combine:
Contrast, focus order, labels, and target size.
NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver, and TalkBack.
Full operation without a mouse.
When included in scope.
An accessibility review does not replace formal legal compliance advice.
1. Screen for the right users — matching behaviors, experience, and demographics
2. Recruit from your customers or external panels
3. Collect informed consent — before recording sessions
4. Limit access to recordings and anonymize findings in reports
5. Follow privacy rules — including India’s DPDP Act, 2023, and GDPR for EU participants
This is guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements for your situation with legal counsel.
Remote moderated and unmoderated sessions.
Interactive designs for early testing.
Tree testing and card sorting.
Session recordings and heatmaps.
Moderated remote sessions.
Cross-device and cross-browser checks.
Behavior data to support findings.
Yes. While Web Brain InfoTech is based in Delhi, India, we run usability tests for product teams across North America, Europe, Australia, and the Middle East, alongside local clients across Delhi NCR, Mumbai, Bangalore, and Gurugram.
We schedule remote sessions across time zones, recruit participants who match your target market, and can test in multiple languages, including right-to-left (RTL) interfaces for Arabic-speaking users.
What you need to learn and which flows matter most.
Participants, tasks, scenarios, and metrics.
Preparing what will be tested.
Checking tasks and tools before the real sessions.
Moderated or unmoderated, with recordings and notes.
Coding observations, calculating metrics, and rating issues.
Findings, video highlights, and prioritized fixes.
Verifying that changes solved the problems.
Timelines depend on format and recruitment:
Typically 1–2 weeks.
Typically 2–3 weeks.
Typically 4–6 weeks.
Scheduled across release cycles.
We confirm a timeline once the test plan is agreed.
Everything you need to know about our Usability Testing Services.
Tell us about your project and let us turn your ideas into powerful digital solutions designed for growth and performance.